Jaeger-LeCoultre Reverso Classic Duoface SIHH 2016
New Release

Jaeger-LeCoultre Reverso Classic Duoface SIHH 2016

By amanico · Jan 21, 2016 · 8 replies
amanico
WPS member · Jaeger-LeCoultre forum
8 replies2763 views1 photos
f 𝕏 in 💬 🔗

You are a fan of the classic look of the Reverso, you want a time zone watch, and you prefer an automatic movement? In this case, this Reverso Classic Duoface is for you. The case has some generous dimensions, 47 x 28, 3 x 11, 6 mm, and is available in steel or in rose gold. The dials are treated di

8 collectors discussing this on the WatchProSite forumJoin the Conversation →
 

You are a fan of the classic look of the Reverso, you want a time zone watch, and you prefer an automatic movement?

In this case, this Reverso Classic Duoface is for you. 

The case has some generous dimensions, 47 x 28, 3 x 11, 6 mm, and is available in steel or in rose gold. 

The dials are treated differently depending on whether you look at the recto or verso side. 

One precision you will immediately notice, both rose gold and steel versions have the same dials: Silver, vertical brushed and guilloché, transferred numbers, blued hands on the recto, hobnail black, luminous indices and hands on the verso. 

As for the movement, it is the Cal 969, which is automatic, beating at 28 800 vibrations per hour, and offering a power reserve of 38 hours.

Here are the pictures I could take at the SIHH: 

Steel: 


 


 


 
Rose Gold:

 


 
And both, side by side, showing the two dials of the Duoface.






Discrete, serious, friendly. 


For those who prefer more refined, smaller, and a grained dial, all this with a manual movement, there is something else I will review soon, the Reverso Tribute Duo. 

But this Reverso Classic Duoface shows that Jaeger Lecoultre, this year, decided to offer Reversos for every tastes, wrists and budgets. 

Best,

Nicolas



 
This message has been edited by MTF on 2016-01-21 05:46:00
Advertisement
The Discussion
EK
eklektik
Jan 27, 2016
Wow! Not much success around here...

Nobody is interested in this one? Nicolas, could you explain what is on the middle of the back dial? It does look like a not very sharp disc... Best, Etienne

AM
amanico
Jan 27, 2016
I am happy that you answered to this post. It would have been a first if I got no answer from a novelty. ;)

These pictures are featuring protos. I will take pictures of the definitive version when it is available. Not a big revolution, indeed. Best, Nicolas

RO
Robert_
Feb 1, 2016
I second eklektik's observation the 'disc' on the home time dial looks a bit unfinished in the pictures

just too plain almost as if it is there to temporarily cover up what is beneath or it will be replaced by something more beautiful later.....

MI
mikejmccar
Feb 24, 2016
More innovative than it seems!

To me, there are two very interesting developments in this model—one obvious and the other perhaps a bit more subtle. The obvious first innovation is having an automatic movement (rare enough in a Reverso) with a dual face feature. I would think that this would be difficult, not having the rotor interfere with the second face. So I think it's impressive. The second, more subtle feature is the mixing of markers and numbers on the two different watch faces. Previous versions would either have less

AM
amanico
Feb 24, 2016
Thanks for your elaborated feedback, Mike.

There is one thing I don't know... The Automatic movement. Introducing the automatic movement ( which is not totally true, since we already had auto movements with, for example, the Reverso Gran Sport in the early 2000's ), is a good thing, as some strongly desire automatic movements. But is it a good thing to drastically reduce manual movements in the Reverso Family? That, I don't know. Best, Nicolas

MI
mikejmccar
Feb 25, 2016
Automatics

Well, I'm not unbiased here--the only Reverso I own is the Gran'Sport Automatique. So I don't buy into the notion that a manual-winding movement is an inherent feature in a Reverso. (I'd be interested to know if the JLC caliber 966 is basically the same as the 960R in the GSA, which I believe was the first automatic movement in a Reverso.) A duo-faced automatic movement is a first, I think. That said, I do think that it would be best to have a mix of automatic and manual movements in the Reverso

Continue the conversation

This thread is active on the Jaeger-LeCoultre forum with 8 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.

Join the Discussion →