JLC Polaris Date vs. Polaris Memovox SIHH 2018
New Release

JLC Polaris Date vs. Polaris Memovox SIHH 2018

By amanico · Feb 19, 2018 · 59 replies
amanico
WPS member · Jaeger-LeCoultre forum
59 replies13221 views13 photos
f 𝕏 in 💬 🔗

Amanico initiates a compelling comparison between the Jaeger-LeCoultre Polaris Date and the Polaris Memovox, two key releases from SIHH 2018. His post delves into the subtle yet significant differences, inviting the community to weigh the merits of each model. This discussion highlights the nuanced preferences of collectors when faced with modern interpretations of iconic dive watch heritage.



I discussed with many people at the SIHH and virtually, and while I thought that the Polaris Memovox was a clear winner, I was surprised to hear that the victory of the Memovox was not so large. 

Yes, the Polaris Memovox is still a winner, in this " frontal game ", but there are quite a lot of people whose heart drive them to choose the Date. 

The players. 

The Polaris Date, on the left, versus the Polaris Memovox, on the right: 


As you can see, the look is very close, with the same dial and bezel finishings: sunray on the center, grained on the outer part, opaline for the inner bezel, plus the vanilla colored trapezoidal indices and hands. 

The case back is solid in both watches, with the same " Super Compressor " logo engraved on it. 


Both have a sapphire domed glass. 

There are two things you can easily notice, the absence of the legendary alarm triangle and the missing third crown at 3 o clock on the " Date ". Which is easily explainable, as the missing crown is due to the lack of alarm on the " Date ". 

So the crown which operates the turning inner bezel is now located at 2 o' clock on the date, instead at 3 o' clock on the Memovox. 


The case is the same for both watches, with an identical size ( 42 mm ), but a different thickness, 13, 1 mm for the Date, 15, 95 mm for the Memovox. 

Live picture of the Date: 



And of the Memovox: 




The movements are, of course, different: Cal 899/1 for the " Date ", Cal 956 for the Memovox. No alarm and 38 hours power reserve for the first, alarm and 44 hours power reserve for the second, both being automatic and beating at 28, 800 alternances per hour.

The Cal 899/1: 

The Cal 956:

The rubber strap is the same for both, but the " Date " can also be bought with the now famous steel bracelet, which is not the case for the Memovox, even if I think Jaeger Lecoultre won't refuse to sell you the steel bracelet if you prefer the Memovox. 

Those who prefer the " Date " told me that they found it purer than the Memovox. Maybe because of the absence of disc, and the two crowns instead of three. 

There are two points which are counting a lot, for me:

The important difference of thickness, in favor of the " Date ", and the retail, 7700 Euros for the Date with rubber strap, 8600 Euros for the Date with the steel Bracelet, while the Memovox is 12, 800 Euros. 

About the thickness, on the paper there is a major difference, in the real, I had hard time feeling the Memovox was so big. 

The Polaris Date: 


The Polaris Memovox: 


Now, there is the historical point of view. For me, the Polaris Memovox is the winner, because I cannot see a Polaris without an alarm. 

But having the choice can never be seen as a problem! 

What about you? 

Best,

Nicolas

Key Points from the Discussion

Advertisement
The Discussion
TI
Tim_M
Feb 19, 2018

I cannot believe that anyone would complain about the extra crown and dial details associated with the alarm - on a JLC Polaris, no less! That is like complaining about pushers and sub-dials on a Speedmaster Pro or the presence of a dive bezel on a Submariner. Objectively, the Memovox offers more functionality, and subjectively, I find it more attractive. JLC did well to keep the "patina" overtones subtle on both of these models. Best, Tim

MT
MTF
Feb 19, 2018

amanico, Jaeger Lecoultre Polaris Date I understand the nostalgia of the "Memovox' but the Jaeger Lecoultre Polaris Date wins for all the reasons that you proffered. As we always have to move forward rather than vacillate in the past, the 'Date' model gives all the advantages of aesthetic and practical fitting, without the baggage of obsolescence. We all have Smartphones with alarms that can be set to the most intricate of schedules. Regards, MTF

BA
Baron - Mr Red
Feb 19, 2018

.....really important to move forward rather than vacillate in the past. No point being a dinosaur...... ....though of course, dinosaurs did rule the world for an inordinate period of time.

BA
Baron - Mr Red
Feb 19, 2018

....i was very recently at the Natural History Museum. Fantastic dinosuar section. Learnt of a new dinosaur. The Deinonychus. Like a Velociraptor, but a bit bigger. Scientists are now thinking that these dinosaurs hunted in packs....a bit like wild dogs. They would pursue their prey over many miles until the prey was exhausted......just like wild dogs. Their particular skill was not size or strength.....just endurance. Gotta love the dinosaurs.

DA
Dave G
Feb 19, 2018

I visited the London Boutique on Saturday to see the prototypes and full collection. To be honest, they were nice but I wasn’t moved. I really wanted to see the World Time, but the 44mm size is just too big. I would have loved the piece at 41-42mm. The Polaris is nice but I like me TT1968 a bit more. I don’t think therefore I will get any of these new ones. Dave

BA
Baron - Mr Red
Feb 19, 2018

We think we hunt these watches.....yet its the other way around!!!

Advertisement

Continue the conversation

This thread is active on the Jaeger-LeCoultre forum with 59 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.

Join the Discussion →