Jaeger-LeCoultre Master Ultra Thin Jubilé Platinum
Review

Jaeger-LeCoultre Master Ultra Thin Jubilé Platinum

By amanico · Jan 10, 2017 · 40 replies
amanico
WPS member · Jaeger-LeCoultre forum
40 replies7816 views2 photos
f 𝕏 in 💬 🔗

Amanico, known as Nicolas, spotlights the Jaeger-LeCoultre Master Ultra Thin Jubilé Platinum from 2013, reflecting on its design, platinum case, and solid caseback. He invites the community to share their thoughts on this particular reference, which he considers a missed opportunity for his own collection.

40 collectors discussing this on the WatchProSite forumJoin the Conversation →
From let's say the last 10 years, Jaeger Lecoultre released many stars, such as the Duometre, the Tributes, some Amvox, the Gyrotourbillons, without forgetting the Reversos.

We should not forget some Master Ultra Thin. And among them, this Jubilé, unveiled in 2013.

This watch has: 

A very exciting profile. 



A great dial. Even if I would have preferred other hands for that watch.



A platinum case, which gives a very pleasant density when you wear or handle it. 

And a solid case back. Not that the movement is not pleasant to see, but it is way too small for that case. Even for the 34 mm case of the first Master Ultra Thin. 

Last but not least, this watch was a bargain, when released. 

Clearly one I missed, like a few others, such as the Tribute to Reverso Red, for example.  Clearly one I would like to add in my collection. 

Your thoughts on that one? 

Best,

Nicolas

Key Points from the Discussion

Advertisement
The Discussion
KM
KMII
Jan 10, 2017

But would also like to try on the 34mm MUT on first. I guess that would be the more classical size but then it always depends on what fits your specific wrist And definitely the right decision to forego a sapphire caseback in this case - wish more brands would do it that way.

KM
KMII
Jan 11, 2017

Definitely on the to get list. Unfortunately that list is getting longer by the day

BO
Bounce781
Jan 11, 2017

So I got myself a 38mm MUT and it\'s awesome!!! Same movement but more wearable for me. Also, it\'s the first Watch my son ever broke, so it has huge sentimental value Cheers

BO
Bounce781
Jan 11, 2017

I understand this edition was not so popular. I am pretty sure an AD here in Melbourne Australia still had one when I last checked in late 2016

SP
Speedie74 aka Mr. Torquise
Jan 11, 2017

I am always remembering mine: And when I remember mine, I am thinking always: what a pity, that I sold this beauty! Anyway, I have worn the watch less than 10 times in the one and only year, which I have it in my posession! The ground is very simple: this watch is something for a black & white tie, to go to the Opera, it is not an everyday watch. And one more - you will laugh me: I find the watch TOO thin and therefore too fragile! It is like you don't have anything on your wrist! And I like to

KE
keks
Jan 11, 2017

Remember eagerly trying it on when it was released at my local AD but could not appreciate how it wore on my wrist... almost too thin? The rose gold version I like a lot as well as it has a somewhat bigger presence when worn.

Advertisement

Continue the conversation

This thread is active on the Jaeger-LeCoultre forum with 40 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.

Join the Discussion →