JLC Master Ultra Thin: 34mm, 38mm, 39mm Comparison

amanico · 2015-10-23T00:14:22Z

Explore the evolution of Jaeger-LeCoultre Master Ultra Thin watches: 34mm, 38mm 1833, and 39mm Jubilé. Compare case thickness, design, and collector preferences.

amanico

WPS member · Jaeger-LeCoultre forum

23 replies2269 views1 photos

Nicolas, known as amanico, provides a comparative overview of three significant Jaeger-LeCoultre Master Ultra Thin models, highlighting their evolution in size and design. His post invites collectors to appreciate the subtle yet impactful differences across these references, particularly focusing on case thickness and dial aesthetics. This discussion remains relevant for understanding JLC's enduring commitment to ultra-thin watchmaking.

1994: Master Ultra Thin 34 mm:

2008: Master Ultra Thin 1833, 38 mm:

2013: Master Ultra Thin Jubilé, 39 mm:

4, 20 mm thick for the 1994 MUT, 6, 31 mm thick for the MUT 1833, and 4, 05 mm thick for the MUT Jubilé from 2013.

While the MUT 1833 is a very nice watch, it cannot really compete as an ultra thin, compared to the two others.

The shape of the case is different, too, on the MUT Jubilé 2013, with its so called Couteau shaped profile.

The dials of the MUT 34 and 38 are very close, totally different for the MUT Jubilé, with a dial which is inspired from the Ref 2233 unveiled in.... 1958, another Jubilé year:

I love both of them. I would exclude the 1833 because of its thicker case, and hesitate between the MUT 34 and the MUT 39, with a preference for the 39, because of the shape of its case, just spectacular.

And you?

Best,

Nicolas

Key Points from the Discussion

The 34mm Master Ultra Thin, despite its smaller size by modern standards, wears larger and retains significant appeal for its elegance.
The 'couteau' case profile of the MUT Jubilé (39mm) is a notable design feature, with its flush caseback offering a distinct aesthetic compared to earlier models.
The MUT Jubilé is described as 'spectacular' in person, with its case and dial combination being particularly appealing.
The 1833 Master Ultra Thin, while a nice watch, is considered less competitive as an 'ultra-thin' compared to the 34mm and 39mm versions due to its greater thickness.
JLC's classic watches, particularly the 1833 with its chocolate dial, are considered unbeatable even when compared to brands like Piaget.

The Discussion

NT931

Oct 23, 2015

... not that I have the opportunity to own one, but the case and the dial together are so appealing. Having handled it once before at a JLC event, it certainly was a svelte stunner!

watchme

Oct 23, 2015

the 1833 with the chocolate dial and strap was "delicious." In "classic" watches, I find JLC unbeatable (even against Piaget). -Dean

eklektik

Oct 23, 2015

Not so sure about the dots of the other two, as i Am not sure they bring much. Are they visible in the dark? Nicolas, your comment on the couteau dials is interesting. Would you have side views and back views of all watches? I presumed that at least first and last were quite similar in shape and conception. All the best, E.

amanico

Oct 23, 2015

Here is a side pic of the MUT Jubilé: Quite spectacular! Best, Etienne.

jml_watches

Oct 23, 2015

Hi While they're all rather appealing - its the first you mention, the 34mm that really appeals to me. I know its rather small by current standards - but the times I've tried one its always worn a lot larger. Small and elegant. Still not pulled the trigger on one yet - but at some point I'm sure one will come my way. Cheers JML

keks

Oct 23, 2015

Not that I own one but the memory of handling on lingers.... Simply spectacular :

Continue the conversation

This thread is active on the Jaeger-LeCoultre forum with 23 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.

Join the Discussion →

JLC Master Ultra Thin: 34mm, 38mm, 39mm Comparison

Key Points from the Discussion

Continue the conversation

More from this Forum