Jaeger-LeCoultre Master Control Chronograph 145.8.31
Vintage

Jaeger-LeCoultre Master Control Chronograph 145.8.31

By KMII · Nov 5, 2017 · 34 replies
KMII
WPS member · Jaeger-LeCoultre forum
34 replies8883 views1 photos
f 𝕏 in πŸ’¬ βœ‰ πŸ”—

KMII's intriguing discovery of the Jaeger-LeCoultre Master Control Chronograph 145.8.31 sheds light on a unique chapter in JLC's history. This article delves into the watch's distinctive mecha-quartz Caliber 630 movement and its remarkably thin profile, prompting a discussion among collectors about its place in horological innovation and collectibility. KMII's post highlights a piece that challenges conventional notions of luxury watchmaking.

34 collectors discussing this on the WatchProSite forumJoin the Conversation →
While browsing watch related stuff online - I guess I am not alone in that affliction - I accidentally stumbled across the 145.8.31 that entered the JLC portfolio in 1993 if I am not mistaken and was still on sale in 2003 (maybe even later).

Whether it is one of the more elegant chronographs of the decade may be in the eyes of the beholder but it appears to be one of the thinnest ones. 34mm x 8mm would count as ultra thin for a time only watch today, let alone a chronograph.

Already part of the 1000 hour Master Control generation (seen some with the appropriate golden logo on the case back and some with a display case back) it hides a feature not much in vogue at JLC today - namely its Cal. 630, 25 jewel movement. An example of the mecha-quartz developments from the time, with a quartz base but a mechanical chronograph operation (to amongst other things ensure an almost instantaneous reset), it probably forms an era Swiss brands would rather forget nowadays.



Picture from: Touch of Modern

Still I have to say I find it extremely convincing visually, the slender profile and classical size, combined with some lovely details like the red tipped chrono and running seconds hands, the red date font or the patinated lume dots definitely work for me. As for the movement, it may be the red headed step child but in a way it adds an interesting chapter to the story of the watch, too.

What do you think?

Have a great Sunday!

Key Points from the Discussion

Advertisement
The Discussion
MC
MCG (Markus)
Nov 5, 2017
I love the general "visual" - very classy! πŸ‘πŸ»

But, -quarz combined with -34mm case (even for me simply too small) and -too narrow chronograph layout for such a small watch, is simply too much to take... πŸ˜‰

KM
KMII
Nov 5, 2017
Not quite sure I understand the layout bit :)

That 34mm and quartz were going to raise dissent I was pretty certain about

MC
MCG (Markus)
Nov 5, 2017
IMHO - The subdials are to close to each other (still looks ok), would be nice if it would be the opposite, at such a small dial size...

No message body

KM
KMII
Nov 5, 2017
OK now I get it :)

Just did not feel they were that close. Many much more myopic looking chronographs out there But I agree that balance in that respect is very important for a chronograph to look good πŸ‘πŸ»

AM
amanico
Nov 5, 2017
It wouldn't have been mecha quartz nor it wouldn't have this date... I would have grabbed it. [nt]

No message body

RE
rene1
Nov 5, 2017
I must say, I love it!

Although I perfectly understand MCG's point of view, I find it a beautiful chrono and I think it deserves some space on PP. Obviously from a today's point of view it has no sense to produce such a hybrid movement. I personally own its cousin, the IWC "Fliegerchronograph", ref 3741. The first of its IWC family. I bought it in 1991 and still today I love to wear it. I usually wear it when travelling for work, when I need a watch that goes under the radar. If I'm not wrong at that time IWC and JLC

Continue the conversation

This thread is active on the Jaeger-LeCoultre forum with 34 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.

Join the Discussion →