
Esharp's original post ignited a passionate discussion among WatchProSite members, exploring the potential implications of a rumored management buyout (MBO) for Jaeger-LeCoultre. This article delves into the community's diverse perspectives on JLC's market position, product strategy, and the brand's future trajectory, offering a timely examination of a pivotal moment for the esteemed manufacture. Esharp challenges the community to consider whether a change in ownership could revive the brand's perceived 'decontenting' and 'erosion of craft' under Richemont.

And better " out of " Richemont. Best, Nicolas
In my view JLC are the King of Horologerie, the most prolific mouvement designers and manufacturers by far, the so called Trilogy PP, AP, VC and many others have all had a relationships and used JLC movements in their time pieces. JLC have also been and still are, one of the most innovative an accomplished watch-making company in the market. Exciting times indeed.
We all miss Blumlein, the only heir to whom is Max Busser. JLC used to be the watchmaker of watchmakers, but today it’s just another brand with exorbitant prices. A company must be profitable, but it can’t expect never-ending growth like during the pandemic. That was the exception, not the norm.
And if there were shared technologies and revenues coming because of richemont group of watches, what is the substitute for it? It won’t be an easy path, but if they can make the brand more distinctive, it may be worth it.
The question for me is, are they still? I’d like to think so. But am not sure.
…the $ has to come back to earth - just a little bit - and a renaissance in product is needed (perhaps already happening with JL as ‘new’ CEO).
This thread is active on the Jaeger-LeCoultre forum with 21 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.
Join the Discussion →