
Nicolas (amanico) shares his extensive three-week experience with a Jaeger-LeCoultre Duomètre, posing the question of what constitutes a 'real' watch experience. His post invites collectors to consider the profound impact of living with a high-horology timepiece, moving beyond initial impressions to a deeper understanding of its design and engineering. This article synthesizes community insights on the Duomètre's evolution, wearability, and market position.



I need 2 things. 1. bigger wrists 2. more money These watches are amazing. I really love the new watches of JLC and IWC and what they pull off dial and movement wise.
designing and building this movement is truly astonishing. Haute Horlogerie is the one genre where modern watches can hold their own against vintage. Unfortunately two things are to small to consider one of these beauties: 1. My wrists 2. My watch budget How did you find the wearing experience? How is the case diameter and thickness for daily wear?
Yes,the real original version ...in its summer configuration. Nothing beats the original,although I would not mind having the new blue dial moonphase version in my collection. Maybe in 2-3 years from the secondary market .... Best, Gerard
.. perhaps on par for me with the white enamel 40mm quantième lunaire. Cheers, Alex
At 40.5 mm, more fitting for me. And the hammered gold moon phase!
To be honest I kinda like the sharper edges of the original Duometre, that did not reallly need to go away !
This thread is active on the Jaeger-LeCoultre forum with 103 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.
Join the Discussion →