Jaeger-LeCoultre Gyrotourbillon 1, 2, 3, 4 Comparison
Complications

Jaeger-LeCoultre Gyrotourbillon 1, 2, 3, 4 Comparison

By amanico · Mar 27, 2017 · 35 replies
amanico
WPS member · Jaeger-LeCoultre forum
35 replies9179 views6 photos
f 𝕏 in 💬 🔗

Amanico's comprehensive overview of Jaeger-LeCoultre's Gyrotourbillon series, spanning from 2004 to 2016, offers a unique opportunity to appreciate the evolution of this highly complex complication. His detailed comparison of the four iterations highlights their technical marvels and aesthetic nuances, inviting collectors to revisit these significant milestones in horological innovation. This article serves as an excellent reference for understanding the design philosophy and technical advancements behind each Gyrotourbillon.

35 collectors discussing this on the WatchProSite forumJoin the Conversation →
From 2004 to 2016... In Twelve years, 4 different Gyrotourbillons, each of them being pure marvels, bewitching beauties, technical feats. 

2004: Gyrotourbillon One. 



2007: Gyrotourbillon Two: 





2013: Gyrotourbillon Three: 



2016: Gyrotourbillon Four.



The most complicated and surprising was the One, of course. Nobody could see it happen. 

Its design, the combination of this " dancing " tourbillon, the 8 days movement, the perpetual calendar ( retrograde ) and the Equation of Time, all of this is really something... 

The Gyrotourbillon Two set the decoration of the movement to another level. Impressive. 

The issue of the " Two "? The proportions of the case... Which make it hardly wearable for a normal wrist. 

The Gyrotourbillon Three associates the charm of a special tourbillon to the magic of a jumping digital minute chronograph. The decoration launches the hammered finishing. /My only reserve: The sun moon indicator, which is not at its place, in my opinion, in a watch of such a level. 

The Gyrotoubillon Four... An impressive decoration, hiding a fact: A miracle in terms of proportions, which was very challenging, with a height of... 12, 4 mm only.

If money was not an issue, I would say that the " One " and the " Four " are my favorites. 

But I would be very happy with the " One "... Only.  wink

And you, what is your Gyrotourbillon? 

Best,

Nicolas

Key Points from the Discussion

Advertisement
The Discussion
WA
watchme
Mar 27, 2017
They're all amazing...

I prefer the #1 Harmonized the best, with the rose gold accents, etc. The #4 is amazing, and you didn't show the back of the watch, which is another dial that I even like better - the skeletonized version. I'd like to see #4 in a rose gold edition. The warmth of the metal is the best, for me. -Dean

AM
amanico
Mar 27, 2017
Back of the Gyro 4... For you.

SV
SvB
Mar 27, 2017
One number four please:)

This picture of the dial at the back won me over to be honest. Otherwise I was leaning towards Gyro one. But in the end they are all beautiful watches of course, one one would do nicely! Thanks for the pictures.

AM
amanico
Mar 27, 2017
My pleasure, SvB. Thanks for your feedback. [nt]

MI
Mitch K
Mar 27, 2017
Yes the 1 was the first and the earth shattering one. It would be the one to have but as they have all but gone into the wild I would have to suffer with the 4 which is very wearable. The decoration of the 4 compares beautifully with others that I am

fortunate to possess. More on that later. Truthfully the 4 is mind blowing in beauty.

AM
amanico
Mar 27, 2017
More to come later? Hmmmm... That sounds promising. Agreed on the One. And on the Four.

The ideal would be to be able to get both... Best, my friend. Nicolas

Continue the conversation

This thread is active on the Jaeger-LeCoultre forum with 35 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.

Join the Discussion →