
Amanico's post from 2010 offers a valuable look into Jaeger-LeCoultre's then-new 'Extract from the Archives' service, a crucial offering for collectors of vintage timepieces. His detailed review and initial thoughts provide a foundational understanding of what the service entailed at its inception, highlighting its presentation, included information, and limitations. This early insight remains relevant for understanding the evolution of brand heritage services.
I'm not particularly sold on the current "Extract" value proposition yet. The information given on the sample extracts we've seen is quite basic and easily obtained elsewhere. Certainly not the depth of information that I think most buyers would expect from a factory archive research. If the extract doesn't include enhanced information such as: sales agent delivery date & place, original sale price, model background info, authentication of watch and individual parts, production quantities, etc.,
Hey, that was quick! I thought they had closed the shop over the summer. 1/ I agree with you that except information about your specific watch it would be very nice with common information of the watch model. 2/ Not a certificate of authenticity? IMO that’s what most people would like to have, and probably would interpret it as one when for example when buying a watch… 3/ A bit pricy, yes especially if it’s not a certificate of authenticity. It looks very good and I think it’s a great service, b
This new 'extract from the archives' is a nice paper indeed. Not too dissimilar to those produced by IWC and PP (though slightly less detailed, and certainely much more expensive than these other 2 examples which cost 60 and 100 CHF respectively to get) Up til a recent period (and maybe still today?) Jaeger LeCoultre used to deliver a document (for free if I remember correctly), which was a certificate of authenticity and included about the same information than the abstract which replaces it as
Interesting document. That's a pretty generic case reference given: "US Modell". Also, for a post-1932 watch, I would have thought the dial would be signed "LeCoultre" for a U.S. model. Regards, Greg
Yes I agree, this document has errors or to say the least imprecisions in it. The fact is this watch is a non-series production (I doubt it would even have a reference number), and it is likely there is not much information to produce on it (although having more info on its origin would be very interesting) But it is the only such document I have, so I posted it to show that the 'categories' are sort of the same as in the current abstract. This particular one is a bad example (because of lack of
as I recently asked for replacement of a certificate of authenticity but JLC refused.... I will raise the point with them again.... but I was disappointed.... Cheers
This thread is active on the Jaeger-LeCoultre forum with 26 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.
Join the Discussion →