Vintage
Nicolas (amanico) initiates a compelling discussion comparing two significant IWC Da Vinci Rattrapante references: the 3751 and its successor, the 3754. His original post invites collectors to weigh in on which model, the classic or the more modern iteration, resonates most with their aesthetic preferences. This exploration delves into the subtle yet impactful design evolutions within a beloved IWC complication.
The IWC Da Vinci Rattrapante represents a pivotal chapter in the Swiss manufacturer's complicated watch development during the 1980s and 1990s. Following IWC's acquisition by VDO and the ambitious technical renaissance under Günter Blümlein, the Da Vinci collection emerged as the brand's platform for haute horlogerie complications. The Rattrapante, introduced as part of this renewed focus on mechanical sophistication, demonstrated IWC's commitment to producing split-seconds chronographs that could compete with the finest Swiss manufactures.
The reference 3751 houses IWC's caliber 79261, a split-seconds chronograph movement that showcases the brand's technical prowess in creating rattrapante mechanisms. The dial architecture reflects the Da Vinci collection's distinctive design language, with its classical proportions and symmetrical sub-dial layout. The moon phase indicator at 12 o'clock adds astronomical complexity to the chronograph function, while the day-date display provides practical utility. The case design, with its stepped bezel and integrated lugs, established visual cues that would influence subsequent Da Vinci iterations.
Collectors distinguish between the 3751 and 3754 references primarily through dial variations and production details, with both representing significant entries in IWC's complicated watch catalog. The stainless steel execution of the 3751 offers accessibility compared to precious metal variants, yet maintains the technical sophistication that defines serious chronograph collecting. Market appreciation for these references has grown as collectors recognize their position in IWC's modern complicated watch development and their relative rarity compared to contemporary production pieces.
The dial is so much more refined, less cluttered in my view. Dirk
But somehow, it is growing one me because it looks a bit outdated…. And for me, the older dial is more coherent with the look of the case, the lugs etc…
elegant. The newer version is very busy and a bit crowded and not as refined. My son owns the 3751 and it’s lovely. Just my two cents
This thread is active on the IWC forum with 42 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.
Join the Discussion →