Greubel Forsey: Comparing Two Masterpieces

sham1 · 2021-04-02T02:32:19Z

Explore Greubel Forsey's Signature 1 vs. Balancier Contemporain with collector sham1. A candid review of wearability, legibility, and comparison to Roger W. Smith Series 1.

sham1

WPS member · Independents forum

51 replies10232 views4 photos

In this insightful article, sham1, a seasoned collector, takes us on a personal journey comparing two of Greubel Forsey's most 'wearable' timepieces: the Signature 1 and the Balancier Contemporain. His candid assessment, focusing on ergonomics and real-world appeal, provides invaluable perspective for anyone considering these avant-garde independent watchmaking marvels. sham1 also provocatively positions these against the highly anticipated Roger W. Smith Series 1, inviting a fascinating discussion on collecting philosophy.

51 collectors discussing this on the WatchProSite forumJoin the Conversation →

Earlier today, I decided to head down to my local AD as I knew they had two of the most wearable and most affordable Greubel Forsey watches ever made. The Signature 1 in stainless steel measures 41.4mm in diameter and 11.7mm in height while the more recent Balancier Contemporain in white gold measures 39.6mm in diameter and 12.2mm in height. Both watches are limited to 33 pieces. I am emphasizing the dimensions here because for me and my dainty wrist, all the other watches in the Greubel Forsey range are simply to admire as they would wear too large for me and possibly for many of you too.

I was more excited actually to try on the Balancier Contemporain but was pleasantly surprised that the Signature 1 appealed to me a lot more. I think the contrast of the dial and the hands and its relative simplicity made the watch in my opinion feel more special and reading the time a lot more legible. When a watch costs north of USD150k, I think basic things like legibility becomes almost a must have!

I also felt that the dimensions of the Signature 1 was more balanced and the weight of the stainless steel more agreeable to me than the Balancier's white gold case. Many like to feel the heft of their watches. I prefer not to feel the watch as it is an extension of my wrist. Oddly enough the dial of the Balancier Contemporain looked a lot better in photos than it did in reality. It just did not feel special enough in my opinion. Yes these watches are exceedingly well made but a watch at any price range, let alone this one, needs to provide a feel good factor to its wearer.

In less than 13 months time, I shall be taking delivery of the long awaited Roger Smith Series 1. I asked myself today if I would opt for either of these Greubel Forsey watches if I had to choose the Series 1 over them and I must confess, the Smith would triumph. However, I would be very happy to own a Signature 1 with the Series 1 (notice the uncanny similarity in the model name!) as that would almost be the ideal two watch collection! But who am I to kid anyone? A two watch collection?? I have three at present and am ambitiously planning to stop at five.

Thank you for reading and sorry that the photos are not at the same level as that taken by MJ23, Mike H and Forevsta.

The Signature 1

41.4mm seldom looked so good on my wrist!

The Balancier Contemporain

The Series 1

Key Points from the Discussion

The perceived 'bulkiness' of a watch is highly subjective and relative, even among independent haute horlogerie pieces. A 12.2mm height might feel substantial to one collector, while another finds a 10.9mm watch bulky.
For ultra-high-end watches, the primary function of telling time can sometimes be secondary to their artistic merit. However, legibility remains a critical factor for many collectors, even when drawn to avant-garde designs.
Comparing a Greubel Forsey with a Roger W. Smith is challenging due to their distinct philosophies, yet both represent the pinnacle of independent watchmaking. A collection featuring both would be exceptional in terms of quality.
The Greubel Forsey Signature 1 is notably more wearable than many other avant-garde timepieces, such as those from MB&F Legacy Machines or Urwerk, making it a strong contender for daily wear.
The allure of an avant-garde timepiece can surprise even collectors with a preference for classic watches, demonstrating how hands-on experience can shift perceptions.
While the Signature 1 is considered more subdued, the Balancier Contemporain is praised for its distinct Greubel Forsey style and appealing size. However, the Roger W. Smith Series 1 is often viewed as being in a league of its own.

The Discussion

NoH

Apr 2, 2021

Those GF’s are fantastic!

But that Series 1 😍😍😍😍 is just amazing! All the best, Niall

sham1

Apr 2, 2021

Thanks Niall!

I concur

sham1

Apr 2, 2021

I am still deliberating on the Signature 1

but shall wait for the 2021 novelties to appear first.

NoH

Apr 3, 2021

It would be a good choice,

But if GF are working on some new editions at the moment, it could be prudent to wait a little bit and see what they release.

sham1

Apr 3, 2021

Wait

I definitely will. I am not just waiting for GF's new releases but also that of all the brands. A Patek 5231G would melt me!

ZSHSZ

Apr 2, 2021

Classic always triumphs! That RS is beautiful, hope you get it soon...

Continue the conversation

This thread is active on the Independents forum with 51 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.

Join the Discussion →

Key Points from the Discussion

Continue the conversation

Related Articles