2013 Concours de Chronométrie: Tissot's Victory
Discussion

2013 Concours de Chronométrie: Tissot's Victory

By Ed. W · Nov 6, 2013 · 30 replies
Ed. W
WPS member · Horological Meandering forum
30 replies10264 views0 photos
f 𝕏 in 💬 🔗

Ed. W's original post on the 2013 Concours international de chronométrie results sparked a lively debate about chronometric performance versus luxury watchmaking. His observation that Tissot outperformed prestigious brands, even in the tourbillon category, challenged conventional wisdom and prompted the community to re-evaluate the true meaning of accuracy in high horology. This discussion remains relevant for collectors considering the value proposition of precision versus artisanal craftsmanship.

30 collectors discussing this on the WatchProSite forumJoin the Conversation →

The concours ended with somewhat disappointing results. Interestingly, Tissot beat everyone (and even many of the previous tourbillons) to win the top 2 in the non-tourbillon section. Even more disappointingly  only one of the 7 tourbillon entires finished (entires from prestigious makers including Laurent Ferrier, Greubel Forsey, and L.U.C. Chopard did not even pass the torture tests). 


An absolute monster of accuracy (878 and 850 pts.) improving on their 764 pt 2011 result with the 2824.


Encouragingly, two of the twelve student entires (from Mathieu Douik and Maxime Bettenelli of CIFOM passed.


Full results are below (click to enlarge): 



Key Points from the Discussion

Advertisement
The Discussion
FO
foversta
Nov 6, 2013
the concours itself is disappointing

Lack of interest from the brands, very few contenders, this concours is fading into obscurity. Who really cares about these results? And it is a pity since chronometrie should be the ultimate objective of each and every brand. Fx

ED
Ed. W
Nov 6, 2013
Conflict of interest

I think the concours is already exercising tact in only publishing the top 3 results and not mentioning the losers. It's also often argued that accuracy is not important but I think while it's not the only factor, it's still very important. I guess brands just don't feel they need an independent body to judge them (COSC aside, they simply give pieces of paper and don't judge). I'd really like to see more interest in this from major brands. Eddie

SA
Sandgroper
Nov 6, 2013
Strange that someone could even think about arguing.....

that accuracy is not important for a time-piece??!! It would be like arguing that taste is not important for a wine! Bizarre I tell you, very bizarre!! Cheers, Francois

RO
Ronald Held
Nov 6, 2013
What he said!! (nt)

NT

SA
Sandgroper
Nov 6, 2013
Bonjour FX. Who really care for these results?......

I for one! Definitely! We are talking horology are we not? Cheers Francois from Down Under

WH
Whirling
Nov 6, 2013
Not a disappointment, a lesson.

While it's not exciting that a VERSION of an inexpensive movement has one the contest again, it shows that a lot of what we all love about movements has nothing to do with actually making them more precise timekeepers. Also, as we were discussing recently, it confirms just how excellent, in functional terms, the Eta movements really are. It also is my understanding that tourbillons, no matter how intriguing and enjoyable to admire, don't actually make a modern movement more precise...and neither

Continue the conversation

This thread is active on the Horological Meandering forum with 30 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.

Join the Discussion →