Discussion
Clueless_Collector's insightful post revisits the Cartier Clé, a collection launched in 2015 and quietly discontinued. He prompts a crucial discussion: why did a watch with such distinctive Cartier design elements, including a unique crown and elegant curves, fail to capture the market's attention? This article explores community theories on its reception and potential for future appreciation.
But at the time, The Cle wasn't distinct enough. The case is a very 1950s/60s style. And the crown wasn't super distinctive like Pasha. Buyers of Cartier typically go for "obvious" designs and the Ballon Bleu was the hot item amongst housewives. I've even heard from a wife of a PuristSPro member that she wore Patek Philippe and Vacheron Constantin and the other parents at her child's school didn't know what she was wearing and they only knew Rolex and Cartier Ballon Bleu.
I used to work for a Cartier AD and I got the feeling women didn't view the Cle as an aesthetic upgrade over the more common/historical offerings in the Cartier lineup nor the almighty Ballon Bleu. One thing for sure is the crown was a pain in the arse to wind, and not so easy to pull out to adjust the date and time. It was also a little thicker than a tank francaise, etc. and thus ultimately never caught on. Myself, I liked it!
I liked how you described the practicality of the crown, lol….a main feature of this watch 😅 Who knows in future these might make a comeback in next century, when Cartier looked at their “archives”, like history repeating itself now with the Chinoise, Normale etc.
I liked the case. I found the crown finicky but that sapphire gave it a lot of Cartier dna. I saw it being launched at SIHH and I liked it but I had my doubts that it would be a big commercial success like Ballon Bleu.
Even if there are blings, we will still wear them too 😬😅
This thread is active on the Cartier forum with 20 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.
Join the Discussion →
