BMW 120d 5000 Km Review
Automotive

BMW 120d 5000 Km Review

By bimbeano · Aug 3, 2015 · 24 replies
bimbeano
WPS member · Automotive forum
24 replies6656 views10 photos
f 𝕏 in 💬 🔗

Bimbeano shares his initial impressions after driving his new BMW 120d for 5000 km. His detailed review focuses on the car's performance, handling, and comfort, offering a candid comparison to his previous Renault Clio RS. This post provides valuable insights for anyone considering the BMW 120d, highlighting both its strengths and areas for improvement from a driver's perspective.

Where to start off ?

So after a month i've already travelled quite some distance with the new 120 diesel.
To give you guys an update; i bought this car to replace the Clio RS, but i'm keeping the RS as a second (kind of) car, still have an Audi A4 Diesel but i think it's done 500 miles these last 2 months ... .
BMW 120d ... two liter turbocharged stove, 190 horses at 4000 rpm (i think) and 400 Nm at 1750-2250 rpm-ish ... 8 speed ZF automatic transmission.

I'll start with the BIG plus, the main reason i bought this car .. the ZF 8 speed ... it had to be an automatic and this IS the absolute best on the market these days. What a joy if you want to be lazy and let the car do whatever your brain desires ... so this way we also come to the BIG minus ... no matter how wonderfull this transmission is i really really really miss the joy of poking around the shifter myself, especially when one's used to the fabulous manual gearbox of my little Renault ... (it's actually a Nissan gearbox).

The same counts for the engine ... effortless overtaking slow to medium speed traffic is a piece of cake ... in auto 'D' mode you can immediately decide to select one or two lower gears and hit the throttle, the respons is ... errrr ... let's say fast ... BUT ... nothing compared to the little Clio . On the other hand once the BMW is off ... it goes damn fast, remember you have 400 Nm at your disposal at very low rpm.

Road handling .... there really isn't much i can say to this point yet. Since the engine is just driven in i only had a few chances to try some fast cornering, the wide types provide a lot of grip but the weight is there, the full (unloaded) 1460 kilos. That's 240 kilos more than the Clio but they feel like 500 more strangely. I guess it's just a matter of getting used to it so more on the sheer driving pleasure in a later post with some videos i hope .... remember RWD and fully (i hope) deletable traction control smile !!!






Due to the fact it takes up speed so easily i fear for my license ... 




Interior is fine as well, the Alcantara seats give good side support and are adjustable in many directions .. however on the long trips my back really started to hurt, they are simply to hard, especially compared to the soft French seats of the Renault which i got used to !





This is one of the nicest cockpits to date for a modest car and that steering wheel is fabulous !




The 120d comes with bigger brakes compared to the 118d, a 2 liter as well but only 150 hp ... there is another 2 liter with 2 turbos and 224 hp / 450 Nm .
The tires are runlets ... and here i really have a BIG issue ... in Belgium we have a lot of very bad concrete roads which i've gotten used to thru the years of driving and trashing around. On these roads the Clio can be a real nasty beast which literally slams it's tires down because of the hard and lowered suspension.
The first evening i took my wife out for a drive with the 120d and unavoidably we came onto one of these concrete roads ... after a few miles we looked at each other and couldn't believe how hard the ride was, imagine this with the hard seats and you know i was thinking what the heck did i buy ? The problem lies in the fact this car is equipped with runflat tires and a friend told me the Bridgestone's are amongst the hardest ... :-( ... so for now i'll have to live with that 'problem' but i fear once i got to know the car better (how to drift it) the 400 Nm will be adequate enough to solve the problem. 




Do i like the looks of the car ? 
The rear seems a bit strange to me, proportions are a bit awkward to me.




3/4 rear view is better but those lights are too big !




I mentioned before it is a hot hatch but Luc described it better being a shooting break. I like this view a lot better already !




The nose-view is the best, the typical BMW-kidneys are bigger now and the gaping mouth where you can see the radiator (or is it an intercooler?) are quite impressive to say the least.







Verdict ? 
None yet, i have to get used to the car more ... but i do think i'll have a look at the new Mazda MX-5 Miata ... for europe there is a 1.5 litre naturally aspirated version with 130 hp at 7000 rpm ... and a 997 kilos on the scale make it a very fun car to drive ... and then there will be the 2016 Alpine .... ;-)

Bim
This message has been edited by bimbeano on 2015-08-03 16:23:45

About the Automotive Patrimony Ref. 4000

The Patrimony reference 4000 represents a specific offering within the broader Patrimony collection, known for its focus on classic watchmaking principles. This particular reference emphasizes a clean aesthetic, aligning with the collection's overall design language that prioritizes legibility and understated sophistication. It is designed to appeal to collectors who appreciate traditional watchmaking without excessive embellishment, fitting into a lineage of timepieces that highlight fundamental horological craftsmanship. The model maintains the collection's reputation for refined proportions and a balanced dial layout.

This reference features a case crafted from a precious metal, typically gold, with a diameter that ensures a comfortable presence on the wrist while adhering to classical dress watch dimensions. It houses a mechanical movement, often an in-house caliber, known for its reliability and finishing. The watch is protected by a sapphire crystal, providing durability and clear visibility of the dial. The movement offers a power reserve suitable for daily wear, reflecting the brand's commitment to functional excellence.

For collectors, the Patrimony reference 4000 is a compelling choice for its adherence to enduring design codes and its representation of the brand's core values. It appeals to those seeking a versatile dress watch that can be worn for various occasions. The reference contributes to the Patrimony collection's reputation for offering timepieces that are both technically sound and aesthetically enduring, making it a relevant piece for those building a collection focused on classic horology.

Specifications

Caliber
2450 Q6
Case
18k pink gold
Diameter
40 mm
Dial
Silver
Water Resist.
30 m
Crystal
Sapphire

Key Points from the Discussion

Advertisement
The Discussion
AM
amanico
Aug 3, 2015

The design of this " 1 ", I alway found it weird. A BMW, yes, but not sure this is the one for you. Come on, go for a M. Maybe my next car. ;) Best, Nicolas.

BI
bimbeano
Aug 4, 2015

There even is a launch control ... but i fear it's more kind of a clutch-burner :-) ... take-off in first two gears is really impressive .. what follows then is seriously less impressive. The car should be as fast accelerating as the Clio but it doesn't give 10% of the Clio's exhilaration. And then ... there's the bendies again :-( ... way too heavy car and a bit wobbly on the springs ... though there's a lot of grip from the wide tires ..... playing with the gears in manual mode is way too comp

WA
watercolors
Aug 5, 2015

purchase ! This is a definitely a good looking , strong and and fun car . I wish you many, many years of safe driving:) Good review too. Best Edward

BI
bimbeano
Aug 5, 2015

It is good looking indeed ! Especially the nose where you can clearly see the radiator and intercooler .. never mind the numberplate (photoshopped and a bit of an unlucky choice of duplicating the wrong number and letter i guess ) ... . I'm getting more and more used to it now, just put the auto gearbox in 'Sport' and let the car choose the gears, if needed you can always select 'manual' to keep a certain gear a bit longer ... . Filip

BI
bimbeano
Aug 6, 2015

.. as i managed 3,7 l/100 km on a 90 km trip :-) Filip

CR
crown comfort
Aug 6, 2015

I can chime in some of my views as I have the same car, well almost. It's now 2.5 years so before the facelift and I drive a petrol, ahem the M135iX :) I fully agree overall. Mine does not have the runflat tires, I simply hate them, but still the ride is hard as a rock. My biggest complaints: a 50L tank, what were they thinking??? I need to stop every hour for fuel if I let it run freely :( The 6 cylinder engine is a dream, I also have the sports automatic with 8 gears (standard for X-Drive). I

Advertisement

Continue the conversation

This thread is active on the Automotive forum with 24 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.

Join the Discussion →