patrick_y
[PuristSPro Moderator]
33643
Looks good!
Is that a hot enamel dial? I'm going to assume not because of the hole punched for the date dial.
Great looking watch. I personally would loose the "Automatic" script on the dial. The date doesn't bother me, but the cut off of the Roman Numeral III is less aesthetically pleasing to me somewhat.
A continuous suggestion I have with Chopard L.U.C is related to the lack of a design language and the suggestion is to perform some sort of consistency in creating one. When you see the watch without seeing the brand name, you can rarely say for certain it's a Chopard L.U.C (unless it's a Tech Twist series). Whereas other brands, there's this underlying brand DNA, where one can relatively tell it's a Patek Philippe, a Vacheron Constantin, or something else. There are models that I'm not familiar with and I can still formulate informed guesses based on the "style" of the watch.
Great looking watch!
Anyone see the Chopard Classic Manufactum automatic yet?
What are you thoughts on this piece? I posted about it awhile back ago but any Chopard fans here see it in the stores yet? Beautiful elegant piece, even if the dial would look cleaner without the date. Cheers, Anthony...
I think it's very pretty EXCEPT for the dreaded date.
The lacquer dial is gorgeous. Cheers, Daos
Sometimes the date kills
That's the case with this watch--and the other excellent offering from Chopard--the one with the Romans and date at 6. It's sooooooooo nice, but... details matter!
Looks good!
Is that a hot enamel dial? I'm going to assume not because of the hole punched for the date dial. Great looking watch. I personally would loose the "Automatic" script on the dial. The date doesn't bother me, but the cut off of the Roman Numeral III is les...