I have to agree.

Mar 16, 2017,20:52 PM
 

I am not drawn to smart watches, but this one is appealing.

  login to reply

Comments: view entire thread

 

Montblanc Summit Smartwatch

 
 By: KMII : March 16th, 2017-13:09
Montblanc has just unveiled the Montblanc Summit Smartwatch in cooperation with Google. Read more about it here: Image courtesy of Montblanc ...  

to be honest...

 
 By: mahesh : March 16th, 2017-14:49
first time the face of smart watch is attractive to me. Best, mahesh.,

I have to agree.

 
 By: Magoo : March 16th, 2017-20:52
I am not drawn to smart watches, but this one is appealing.

+1 :) [nt]

 
 By: KMII : March 16th, 2017-21:49

Same for me

 
 By: mj23 : March 16th, 2017-22:59
Never interested in a smart watch until I saw this one. Esp, it has the 1858 Tachy dial too.

Opinions seem to be quite split...

 
 By: KMII : March 16th, 2017-23:39
If you look at the main thread there is only one thing The watch does not do - leave people cold There are those who like it (a lot) and those who feel exactly the opposite (also a lot). Let\'s see what the final success turns out to be...

Yes I saw

 
 By: mj23 : March 17th, 2017-06:56
I can see it go both extreme ways esp 1858 Tachy is used again after bronze is also introduced.

Montblanc must quickly made decide to make a distinction between Montblanc / Minerva

 
 By: ambel : March 17th, 2017-03:31
Do not mind Montblanc having affordable watches in their collection neither having a smartwatch But wanting to compete with their Villeret branch with the likes of Patek, Lange, VC - can only be done when seperating both type of markets If they call all w... 

If Montblanc was a standalone company...

 
 By: KMII : March 17th, 2017-03:35
I would stand fully behind your recommendation. Being part of the Richemont Group, which also includes a VC and an ALS the question of whether another separate brand is necessary would need to be answered. There I have simply too little internal knowledge... 

Bad concept

 
 By: fifty fathoms : March 22nd, 2017-11:41
.... you buy an expensive good looking watch and in 5 years the smart functions are technically 200 years old... Better to buy a new rolex for you and the next generation and a new smartwatch every two years.

The problem of electronic devices generally...

 
 By: KMII : March 22nd, 2017-12:11
So not only of this one. But we still get mobiles and computers every couple of years in spite of the same dynamics...

Exactly :)

 
 By: KMII : March 22nd, 2017-22:55
But does not quite fit the \'fit for eternity\' positioning that the watch industry has chosen over the last two decades...

A little bit different

 
 By: fifty fathoms : March 22nd, 2017-12:45
You buy a luxury mechanical watch with additive digital functions which you can only use a short time. We have two arms. The left is for the mechanical watch and the right is good for the smartwatch...;-)

The difficulty of architectural innovation...

 
 By: KMII : March 22nd, 2017-22:56
And why it\'s usually outsiders that do it better than incumbents. No past to defend, etc.