Greenwatch
1037
I agree. To add...
Feb 03, 2021,07:13 AM
The lack of a quick date changing mechanism and the difficult to change time with a hexagonal crown made it a constant annoyance plus horror stories about broken stems from inadvertent winding exercise definitely make a compelling case for a 15300.
Comments:
view entire thread
15202 vs 15300
By: woodman : January 31st, 2021-22:09
Hi, With the fuss around Genta sports watches these days, there seems to exist peer pressure to buy one of those pieces.. I have always been more of a leather strap kind of guy, but have owned and own some steel watches - one of them being 15300. Everyone...
Notable differences...
By: ArmisT : January 31st, 2021-23:11
I have a couple of 15300s which I like very much, still. Initially, the 15202 didn’t grab me as much because it is notably thinner and dressier than the 15300...which I like because of it relative ruggedness that I regarded as going with the uniquely angu...
Hahaha 1
By: CGJ0 : February 1st, 2021-02:19
The watches feel much different on the wrist.
By: MichaelC : February 1st, 2021-06:01
I wore a 15300 starting in 2006, and wore both a bracelet and strap model for some time. The 15202 is just different. Thinner, obviously, but a different experience. I admire the robustness of the 15300, I love the dial. But I prefer the 15202.
I like the 15300st more than any other RO
By: oyster case : February 1st, 2021-16:02
As you and others have said, there is a robustness to it. However it is still quite thin and sleek. I love the proportions, just perfect. But the biggest plus in its favour is the second hand. I just can’t get into a sport watch that doesn’t have one. Maj...
I agree. To add...
By: Greenwatch : February 3rd, 2021-07:13
The lack of a quick date changing mechanism and the difficult to change time with a hexagonal crown made it a constant annoyance plus horror stories about broken stems from inadvertent winding exercise definitely make a compelling case for a 15300.