sergio
[Panerai Moderator]
5141
I read Perez's exposee...
with great interest although, some 75% of what I read, I knew already. In Corporate lingo, in-house, means made under the corporate roof, regardless of the subsidiary that ACTUALLY manufactures it. On top of that, the practice of buying parts from outsiders, it's ALSO accepted in stride. International trade dictates that if you manufacture the greater percentage of components inside one of your products, you can claim "paternity" for the whole shabang 
What saddens me, is the fact that if they chose to concentrate all the movements' production in one of the subsidiaries (Valfleuriers, in this case), they should also have created separate sections, where different QUALITY of movements were manufactured, according to the models in which they were to be used. That would at least ensure that all the "bells and whistles" that are expected in a top of the line movement, where actually there. I find it totally desplicable, using cheap movement in what will be sold as high end models. But hey, corporate philosophy is just that, cutting corners, the hand's quicker than the eyes etc etc I have no comments for the bloggist or web-zines that litterally "lick the potent's boots". They also, are part and parcel of our..modern society. I have written many a time, in several fora, that the world has gone through eras: the era of iron, the era of bronze, the era of gold etc The one we're living in at the moment, in MY PERSONAL OPINION, is the: styrofoam era. Everything is cheap, disposable and price factor has overtaken the...value one, by leaps and bounds. The buyer is PERFECTLY aware of this status quo. There was a time, when you walked by a luxury shop window and just marveled at all the beautiful things inside, perfectly aware you could never afford them and perfectly as ease with yourself. Today, in front of the same luxury shop window, a great number of people start calculating, how much money they can BORROW and what they can SELL, just to be able to afford the CHEAPEST object in the window. Again what I write reflects MY PERSONAL OPINION and is not based on market researches or any other "scientific" studies.
Panerai In-House Movements – A PAM Of Worms
A revealing article about Panerai, other Richemont brands and even Rolex: Panerai In-House Movements – A PAM Of Worms – Vintage Panerai and other iconic timepieces under the loupe at Perezcope Photo: Hodinkee ...
Interesting read and thanks for sharing! It is sad and not that surprising…I love the Panerai(s) I own but staying away from the newer models…
They are devaluing the brand with such action I think. Sad!
I bought my 177, because it was 6497 movement. Though Panerai gave it an OP designation, I knew what it really was.
Where is it written that the consumer must relinquish their healthy skepticism? There is an old saying, "Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me." The 318 Brooklyn Bridge was their "shame on you moment." After that episode, one should be aw...
That is how the Swiss industry operates to get high profit margin.
And that is why I listed that I will get an open/display case back watch if I get a PAM. ; ) But PAM is a bit greedy charging so much for a watch using such movement… it not even top grade…they can at least change to a gold rotor to charge so much for the...
Frankly, I have nothing against using such movements.
But the misleading part - I hope it is not intentional. If it is, then it is a shame. I thought Panerai were doing some pretty great stuffs over the last few years but all the hard work would have come to naught with yet another scandal.
Alas It Is Intentional By Panerai
Many here know I'm a luxury audio journalist for decades and a mechanical timepiece and clock enthusiast for equally as long. I have longtime journalist friends within the timepiece industry. When Panerai switched 9010 movement feature and decoration in t...
Thank you for the insights , jmho.
In this case, it is a shame. I felt that Panerai was at the early stage of a V-shape recovery with some promising pieces in the recent couple of years. Seems like they have undone a lot of their good work with this kerfuffle.
Nothing new under the sun. Panerai never made in house movements, from its creation in 1936, to these days of ours, passing by March 1997 when Vendome bought Panerai.
Valfleurier, ETA, Dubois Depraz, Rolex, Angelus... Here are the names of the movements used by Panerai. It always amused me to see them calling the VF movements in house. I much preferred when they called themselves " Laboratorio de Ideas ", which better ...
Indeed sad and a shame...but I can understand the "why"
It is inexcusable to "lie" to one's consumers. That is truly upsetting and I am glad to see truthful reporting on this. So, how far does "twisting the truth" go until it becomes a lie? Nowadays, with all the hype over and demand for "in-house" movements; ...
Agreed, no shame in ETA or Sellita
Bell&Ross, for example, uses such movements and are priced accordingly. Would you say Panerai's current pricing scheme is worthy of the movement, case, etc that makes it a finished product? Is Panerai simply a FASHION BRAND?
Why?
Why would they allow this lovely Italian brand to devolve into what it is today? Such a popular brand and following thrown to the wind. Faking and fooling? Super sad. Nothing really worth admiration since Bonati left and I don’t see this changing anytime ...
Thank you!
Agree with you 100% and miss the more classic and pure historic Panerai models. Not moved by the current offerings or leadership.
If only the answer to your question....
were that simple. Dr. Bonati performed miracles, in order to bring Panerai to where it is today. But the PAM318 "fiasco" happened under...his...tenure. So, let's keep a even-keeled perspective here
True. I agree.
What you say is very true, but should have been a one and done mistake, lesson learned. The good Bonati did, helped out weigh this blunder, but can not erase this. My original point, is the current team is....floundering on many fronts. I hope for change ...
Panerai...soul????????
you're jesting, I'm sure Lollll There has never been one, as far as watchmaking is concerned. The Panerai soul, the one that was TRULY the essence of Panerai, had to do with different products and support for the Italian Navy, still protected by Military ...
Panerai evokes....
brave, intrepid, fearless men from the Gruppi Gamma of the Italian Navy, that aboard precarious vehicles (S.L.C., Barchini, M.A.S.) went into the unknown with a Panerai strapped on their wrists. This is what rivets a purist. I have to be honest, I don't e...
Just for clarity; “rings true for me” was an acknowledgement of the statement relative to how I see and how I experienced Panerai collectors.
It is not how I see Panerai. The history is and was for the most part irrelevant to me. The only element which resonated was it been a tool watch, but the specifics of that were of little interest. For me, twenty years ago when I saw one first I just like...
I guess one can fall in love....
with the same person (I can't say the same woman anymore haha) for different reasons, of course. No harm done Lollllllllllllllllllll
Indeed.
It’s not that I would ignore the history, but it was never why I bought one and wouldn’t have been something to tip me over the edge or indeed keep me coming back. It’s different for others, and I understand that.
Great Point.
For many, Panerai is just a fashion brand and it appears Richemont is now migrating more towards that with basic usable movements while expanding the fashion styling in various casings. i love my Bell&Ross and they use mainstream known good movements ...
Wow, great article, that was a great (sad) read thanks for posting.
Sad but not surprising... Which is also sad. It makes me wonder what Richemont shenanigans are happening with VC and Lange.....
I read Perez's exposee...
with great interest although, some 75% of what I read, I knew already. In Corporate lingo, in-house, means made under the corporate roof, regardless of the subsidiary that ACTUALLY manufactures it. On top of that, the practice of buying parts from outside...
The denial of its DNA
I remember a conversation with the brand’s CEO In early 2000’s, at the time Panerai had to project their future, the choice was between investing in marketing strategies or invest into a manufacturing plant. I proposed a different path, invest in a labora...
I agree with you on many levels.....
but the gravest "ingenuity" committed by Panerai, is to have been able to alienate a grassroot base, that didn't LOOK INSIDE THE WATCH. A grassroot base that bought a Panerai for the way it made them feel, when strapping one on the wrist, regardless of wh...
Quite sad to read about this confirmation of my feelings/intuition about this problem
I believe some other brands were guilty of this malpractice in the 90s (like GP maybe). I hope however, this is largely over in the industry, notably because an army of enthusiasts is ready to analyse every new release. Power is to the customers nowadays,...
Great comment.
That is also something I hope for. The power of the enthusiasts. Best Thomas
Terrible!!
Personally, I have had very good experiences with ETA movements and I have absolutely no reservations here. Some of my favorite watches (for example my IWC Da Vinci Perpetual Rattrapante) are based on an ETA movement. These movements have been tried and t...
Shame
I was really considering getting back into Panerai. 42mm Submersible or Luminor would have been nice to have in the collection. However, I do not think I would add Panerai after this.
Truly a shame.
I'll keep my old few Panerai's but I don't see myself buying any more new ones specifically because of crap like this.
Yikes
No problem with movements that are not in-house personally, but I do see an issue with misleading people.
As much as people like to cannonize Bonati, he presided over, and was callous about the PAM 318 scam the company pulled on its fans.
After years of publicizing through its dealers and online that raw 6497 Unitas movements were the easiest way to spot a fake Pam, they decide to do just that, presumably to save a few bucks. When caught, he's pronouncement to the faithful was simply that ...
If it's all the same for you.....
I'll keep my "oldie" with God knows what's inside and my trusted and the always scrumptious....margherita, from my favourite local pizzeria :P :P ...
Shocked 😳
To me that’s fraudulent. Sorry for my harsh words. Didn’t believe my eyes. I‘m done with Panerai. Thx to Perezcope for his great recherche. Best Tempus
Welcome to the club.....
I've "been done" with Panerai for quite sometime now. Enjoy your new status. Sorry, out of curiosity, how many Panerai di you own?
The 'vintage' models may do well
I've been hearing that 'vintage' models will do well so there is good news to Panerai's apparent direction. The old legendary ones with Rolex and other good movements of course.
The vintage models 1936 to 1993
have always had a niche of their own. There has been a bubble for them too, but I didn't turn into a ridiculous 3 rings circus like for the Pre-V and all the T-dialled ones of early Post-V. Nobody ever talks about them in forum because they are an acquire...
Three Ring Circus
Excellent analogy, and hope the Richemont conglomerate can successfully navigate their Panerai branded fashion watches through all this controversy.
My concern with the present management....
it's not so much about "transparency". What they did, is indeed desplicable but the "corporate" world it's an in-bread environment by now, where everything goes so long as there is bigger "fistful of dollars" to be made. I'm more disinchanted with the pro...
