blomman Mr Blue
38586
Rolex Sea-Dweller, no cyclops
Mar 28, 2017,01:54 AM
Friends,
After viewing the news from Basel....
I am happy that my travel companion do not have a cyclops!
Best
Blomman
Comments:
view entire thread
Rolex Sea-Dweller, no cyclops
By: blomman Mr Blue : March 28th, 2017-01:54
Friends, After viewing the news from Basel.... I am happy that my travel companion do not have a cyclops! Best Blomman...
:) [nt]
By: blomman Mr Blue : March 28th, 2017-22:16
Two things....
By: Baron - Mr Red : March 28th, 2017-02:05
.....i am happy that you are happy ...i am happy that your SD doesn't have a cyclops
;-)
By: Alkiro1 : March 28th, 2017-09:23
Best wishes Alkiro
:):) [nt]
By: blomman Mr Blue : March 28th, 2017-22:18
:-))
By: Alkiro1 : March 28th, 2017-22:55
Best wishes Alkiro
I'm happy for you ...
By: nilomis : March 28th, 2017-03:56
The one that had the idea of a SD with cyclops should be subjected to flogging. Cheers, Nilo
I'm happy for you my dear friend Blomman!...
By: Subexplorer : March 28th, 2017-04:50
... and for me too as I own both a vintage and a 16600 version of the SD . I feel Rolex missed the train with their new version of SD with cyclops And bigger 43 mm case!! I was so dissapointed as I was waiting for the red inscription SD to add to my colle...
Wonderful picture!
By: KMII : March 28th, 2017-06:27
A better size, yours and more in line with what it should be, too
I'm guessing next year they go cyclopless
By: sentarex : March 28th, 2017-11:24
I feel the new watch appears chunky in photos. I agree in enlarging it, but perhaps 42 would have been better, and also keeping the dimensions more streamlined and elegant. Of course, I am judging only from press pics.